Doctors use lots of little written shortcuts and abbreviations when writing daily progress notes in patients' charts. These notes are not only to document how the patient is doing, but also to communicate our thoughts with nurses, doctors, and other support personnel, so they are rather critical when it comes to patient care. Like my back-road alternate routes, our shortcuts are designed to save time too, but unfortunately that isn't always the case.
As vital as they are, there is just one major problem with trying to read a doctor's note - they are indecipherable. Sure, everyone has heard that old stereotype of doctors and their bad handwriting. But as it turns out, there's a very good reason that stereotype exists - because it's completely true. Our handwriting in general is absolutely atrocious. So why do we do it? Obviously it's to prevent lawyers from being able to read them. There are actually courses in medical school to teach people to write so that it looks like we are holding the pen with our feet while standing on our hands with our eyes closed. Ha ha, I kid. Sort of.
No, the answer is much more mundane - it's simply to save time. When I have to see 15 patients in the hospital, race to my office to see 10 more, then race back to the hospital to get to the operating theatre on time, every second counts, so I scribble notes as quickly as possible.
Unlike many of my colleagues, I do my best to make sure my handwriting is legible, and about 99% of the time I'm successful. But most of my colleagues' notes are basically chicken scratch. It would take the full capabilities of MI6, the CIA, ASIS, and Mossad to translate some of this indecipherable rubbish. I sometimes can't figure out if my orthopaedic surgeon's note says he is going to "repair the tibia" or "replace the television".
Jamie (not her real name), who works in a pharmacy, emailed me a few days ago with this complaint:
"Why don't some doctors seem to see the importance of writing prescriptions in legible handwriting? I've been interpreting them for years, but every once in a while you get one that's really bad. This particular one had me stumped for a while. Would love to hear your opinion on your blog!"
"Cephalexin 500 mg tablets, two tablets twice daily, #40 tablets. Mucinex (alas, no dose!) twice daily, #20 tablets, and Zantac 150 mg tablets, one tablet twice daily, #60 tablets". Somehow I got it completely right. But it underscores a major problem - how are pharmacists supposed to fill prescriptions that they just can't read? If there is a mistake (wrong medication, wrong dosage, etc), it's obviously the doctor's fault first. But I can't help but hold the pharmacist partially responsible if this kind of bullshit doesn't prompt a nasty phone call to the offending doctor admonishing him for writing worse than a 2-year old holding a crayon with his entire fist.
Fortunately hospitals and pharmacies are cracking down on this more and more. And as electronic medical records and electronic prescribing become more widespread, this sort of problem will eventually (hopefully) vanish. Until then, I'll have to continue wondering what the hellis supposed to mean. I think it means either "the patient is doing well" or "meet me at 2PM for golf", but I may have to ask Jamie to translate it for me.
And I thought my handwriting is bad!ReplyDelete
F*** my life and f*** whatever virus is in the process of killing various parts of my grandfather. My grandfather is, well, I can't say ex-Marine because there's no such thing. Why the f*** does he survive being a Marine and even having cancer but now is dying from complications of complications? This kind of thing makes me want to be a doctor someday.ReplyDelete
I get what you mean. My great grandma survived 7 different types of cancer and lived to be 102. She ended up dying from a bladder infection due to nursing home neglect. I wish she could have had the privilege of dying silently from old age, but instead she had to suffer in a hospital for two weeks before finally leaving.Delete
Things are looking better now; we're cautiously optimistic. F*** CANCER!Delete
I got the last one, certainly not the first or second - that being said, when I see Dr's writing orders on my unit (esp the bad ones) I tell them to make sure it's legible or else I will be calling to clarify.... that way I cover my own ass... but at least I tend to get good results!ReplyDelete
Sorry to hear about your grandfather. It's truly awful and no one should have to go through that.ReplyDelete
I have one doctor that I'm tempted when he gives me a script to say "you truly expect me to give this to someone to read and hope they don't give me something deadly?" That being said, the handwriting of the nurse who wrote up my discharge papers after my last surgery was so bad that I had to ask her to interpret."
I've heard that approx. 7000 people in the States die each year because of a doctor's sloppy handwriting...thats kind of shocking considering doctors are meant to save people's lives!ReplyDelete
This seems very relevant to the subject matter :D.ReplyDelete
Escripts aren't too much better. We received one Friday at the pharmacy I work at for lisinopril-hctz with directions of "inhale one puff bid". We are still waiting on a call back from the doctor.ReplyDelete
Hey DocBastard, can you please ban STUART NEWBY. EX KLEINWORT BENSON? He should not be allowed to comment here anymore. Speaking of comments, there is a bug with the mobile site that prevents me from back spacing and then typing again.ReplyDelete
No worries. It was just spam, but it's gone now.Delete
I have no idea what's wrong with the mobile site.
I'm happy to hear from an MD who tries to write legibly. Plainly, electronics haven't ended the need for such competence!ReplyDelete
Kate Gladstone — Handwriting Repair/Handwriting That Works — http://www.HandwritingThatWorks.com
Thank goodness there is now e prescribing.ReplyDelete
We actually practice reading physician-scratch in pharmacy school. I was able to read the prescription with only a bit of trouble on the cephalexin.ReplyDelete
Typically, when contacting a non-hospital physician for clarification on a written prescription, the pharmacist instead gets to talk to the receptionist (usually rather unfamiliar with medications) or, if he/she is lucky, the nurse. I would love to harangue a few of my local GPs regarding their atrocious penmanship but that would necessitate actually getting to speak to them (overworked as they are).
I work as a pharmacy technician and feel like most of my time is not spent filling out the Rxs, it is actually deciphering doctor's prescriptions (so happy that I read Jamie's properly!)ReplyDelete
In my experience, figuring out what medication was prescribed is not the issue (as long as you know your Rx names), rather it is the dosage, number of refills, etc... It's as though doctors spent so much time in school they forgot their years spent in kindergarten and primary school learning how to differentiate "2"s and "3"s from "5"s and "8"s.
I went back to read some of your older posts - because it beats the #&%% out of doomscrolling through even more news about the rising corona virus cases and/or the US election. Two things came to mind as I read this post:ReplyDelete
1. I was able to read that entire rx pretty much right away. I’m not sure if that’s bad or good, but if it had been illegible (even partially) I’d contact the prescriber before filling it. We have a prescriber in our area who has not yet accepted that we are in the age of electronic transmissions (other than that he does use a fax machine - or at least his office staff does) who also doesn’t seem to have retained from grade school an understanding of lined paper. He writes without regard to lines on a telephone physician order and without regard to legibility.
2. I can’t remember where I read it or who said it, but at least every month or so I’m reminded of this quote (I may be paraphrasing a bit): “There is no other profession where such potentially dangerous information is transmitted is such a sloppy manner.”
Bonus Thing That Came To Mind As I Typed This: Another good quote is the one about where the writer’s handwriting looked like “a spider dipped in ink had walked across the page.” (I may be paraphrasing a bit again, but it was spider, dipped in ink, and across the page.)